I really hate writing about this guy, which I personally like and admire… actually it’s probably because I like him that I do… anyhow, yes Ben Carson is full of….! (at least on these points 🙂
I would like to stress I have no qualms against is positions, just his **reasoning**, which to a certain extent makes things worse.
That said, please do watch the entire speech which is quite enjoyable and really is not what media nuts (or even my post title) make it out to be. As far as I am concerned a lot of what he said is quite sensible.
This is in reaction to the *portion* highlighted by Cavuto in in which he makes a couple of claims:
A) The fact that his is a Doctor does not limit his ability to comment on Policy
B) He and others are quite successful in using fact-driven analysis to solve numerous problems
C) A flat tax is fair.
D) God gave a 10% across the board tithing system which should be imitated.
For those not familiar with iguanas, they look rather unbecoming… and one day I had to “usher” a particularly large and ugly one out of the house. It looked ferocious and seemed like it came out specifically to get me. The solution I chose consisted in strategically placing pieces of cardboard and other objects to make a path out of the house. Then I put the animal under pressure and it fled. Done deal. “Easy”.
Being older now, it’s even clearer how much of that “fight” was only in my head. But as a general rule how do you deal with things/people you don’t know/trust and especially who’s intention you have to guess from their outward appearance (or from a report on tv). Is this entity rational, moral, dangerous, God fearing? What are its true intentions?
Gang violence, Immigration, The role of the government in the economy, Education, Moral decline, Couple relationships, Privacy issues, Substance abuse, Population growth control and Unemployment are all topics that are generally not part of the same discussion. Yet, I contented, they are all related. Their solutions, or at least tools enabling more fruitful national and transnational discussion are also related.
In this series i try to explore and summarize in a few sentences (Basic Principles) what I think best describes everything is in the world or how everything works in the world.
I know, tall order. But hopefully the outcome will be useful enough to help model complex situation effectively and simple enough to be conveyed to a large audience.
As a result topics which might seem intractable and viscerally doomed can be put in a context that can show both: what’s happening and what can possibly be a way out.
Big “Caveat”: In no way, this should be construed as a search for “THE TRUTH”. This is only an attempt to find “THE TOOLS” to handle what surrounds us.
I had to post this article because first it was interesting, but most of all because of the discussion I had with the Author. I thought the convo was a prime example of how pre-conceived notions can prevent the most basic of discussions. To me it is a sad commentary on our ability to talk to people we suspect might not agree with us.
That said, I learned a lot… but not what I hoped for.
On the other hand I think will have to investigate a bit of what’s going on in the Climate Change debate.